Authored by: Nishka Prajapati
The
recent death of Bollywood actor Sushant Singh Rajput, who allegedly committed
suicide on 14th June 2020, has left the country in shock and has
once again started the discussion on the much subsided topic of the importance
of mental health. As per sources, the actor was battling depression. This
article focuses on the law surrounding mental illness and suicide.
As
compared to earlier times, the rate of suicidal deaths are increasing every
year in the country and majority of suicides are being committed by the youth
of the country. Depression is a leading cause for the commission of suicide. In
recent years the number of patients suffering from depression has also
increased resulting in an increase in suicidal deaths. In India, an attempt to
commit suicide was a punishable offence under Indian Penal Code, 1860 however
the Mental Healthcare Act 2017 stresses the aspect of mental illness behind the
commission or an attempt to commit suicide and raises the presumption of severe
stress in case of attempt to commit suicide.
In
1946 the Constitution of the World Health organization (WHO) recognized that the
enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the
fundamental rights of every human being without distinction of race, religion,
political belief, economic or social condition. Later, the International
Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, by Article 12 stated that the
States Parties to the present Covenant recognize the right of everyone to the
enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of physical and mental health. Not
only physical but mental health has also been given importance at international
level.
I. Depression is a mental illness:
Mental
illness is present at the time of suicide 27% to more than 90% of the time.[1]
Half of all people who die by suicide
may have major depressive disorder; having this or one of the other mood
disorders such as bipolar disorder increases the risk of suicide 20-fold.[2]
Dr.
Ranna Parekh in her article on depression defines depression as “Depression
(major depressive disorder) is a common and serious medical illness that
negatively affects how you feel, the way you think and how you act. Depression causes feelings of sadness and/or a loss
of interest in activities once enjoyed. It can lead to a variety of emotional
and physical problems and can decrease a person’s ability to function at work
and at home.”[3] Depression is a mental
illness however it also has an adverse effect on the physical and emotional
health of a person.
Mental
illness is defined in section 2(s) of Mental Healthcare Act 2017 - “mental
illness” means a substantial disorder of thinking, mood, perception,
orientation or memory that grossly impairs judgment, behaviour, capacity to
recognise reality or ability to meet the ordinary demands of life, mental
conditions associated with the abuse of alcohol and drugs, but does not include
mental retardation which is a condition of arrested or incomplete development
of mind of a person, specially characterised by subnormality of intelligence.[4]
The
understanding of depression as a mental illness is not yet much developed in
India. Depression is understood as being emotionally sensitive rather than
being mentally ill. The emotional and physical effect that depression has on a
person is not yet understood widely in our country. Due to lack of
understanding of depression as a mental illness many people do not seek medical
help as they think they are not suffering from any disease. Little do they know
that depression is a serious medical illness which might even cause a person to
take his own life. Depression leads to a loss of interest in life which may
cause a person to commit suicide.
II. Suicide
Every
year close to 800,000 people take their own life and there are many more people
who attempt suicide. Every suicide is a tragedy that affects families,
communities and entire countries and has long-lasting effects on the people
left behind. Suicide occurs throughout the lifespan and was the second leading
cause of death among 15-29 year-olds globally in 2016.[5]
Suicide
is the act of intentionally causing one's own death.[6] Mental
disorders, including depression, bipolar disorder, autism, schizophrenia,
personality disorders, anxiety disorders, and substance abuse including
alcoholism and the use of benzodiazepines are risk factors.[7]
Some suicides are impulsive acts due to
stress, such as from financial difficulties, relationship problems such as
breakups, or bullying.[8] Approximately
1.5% of people die by suicide.[9]
Commenting
on the reasons for committing suicide the Andhra High Court observed “There may
be so many reasons for committing suicide. It may be an act of a sickly person,
committed in a of state delirium. It may be a self-centered phenomenon, arising
out of aberrations in individual behaviour. It can be the result of a social
mala adjustment. After all a man's mental stability is conditioned by the
changing developments around him and the social millieu is destined to leave
its impact on man especially when he has to struggle for his survival. It may
be committed due to some of the proximate problems prior to suicide family
dissensions, incurable ailments and guilt complex. There may be many who are
prone to egoistic tendencies and they cherish their individualism as
sacrosanct, the fell dejected. Their will to live and struggle to survive wane
quickly. High individualism may lead to suicide. Sometimes a person kills
himself an a gesture of sacrifice. "Sati" in India had 'Harakiri' in
Japan are well Known. In primitive societies, men of old age embraced death so
that they were not a burden to society. In case there is nothing to look
forward to with hope and nothing to look back with satisfaction. If the society
imposes regulation on individuals and when these check valves weaken, the
individuals become nameless and anonymous entities and let themselves go
without restraint only to land in the pit of dejection and depression. Sometime
fatalism leads to suicide when there is no escape from discipline and
regimentation people may resort to suicide. Many problems like poverty,
deprivation, disappointment and several social mal-adjustments are sought to be
solved by suicide.”[10]
Mentally
ill persons may not exhibit symptoms of their illness in some cases but the
mentally depressed persons are choosing their own ways to commit suicide. Their
disordered mind is searching its own fruitful ways. According to them the horrible sound of the
train is a sweet melody and the flame of the fire may be an inspiration.[11]
Not
only abetment to suicide but attempt to commit suicide was also a punishable offence
under Indian Penal Code.
III. Law Surrounding mental illness
and suicide
3.1 View of Supreme Court and High
Courts on law of suicide (section 309)
Abetment
to commit suicide is a punishable offence under section 306 of Indian Penal
Code (IPC). In addition to this, attempt to commit suicide was also a
punishable offence under section 309 of IPC before 2014. Section 309 of IPC
reads as under:
“309. Attempt to commit suicide - Whoever attempts
to commit suicide and does any act towards the commission of such offence,
shall he punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one
year or with fine, or with both.”
Hon’ble
Mr. Justice R.Basant of Kerela High Court had observed “Whether Section 309
I.P.C. can at all be an offence has been the subject matter of discussion by
the Constitutional Courts on many occasions. In theology, in morality and in
law, suicide has always been reckoned as impermissible whatever be the
justification for such perception. The law does not, of course, make commission
of suicide punishable. Commission of suicide is not made punishable not because
the commission of suicide is not culpable, but because the person culpably
responsible would have departed from this world before he can face any
indictment.”[12]
The
Law Commission in its Forty Second Report had examined whether attempt to
commit suicide be retained as a penal offence. The Commission referred to the
Dharma Sastras which legitimized the practice of taking one’s life in certain
situations and also referred to the provisions of Suicide Act, 1961 in Britain
which decriminalized the offence of attempt to commit suicide. After examining
these views, the Commission recommended that section 309 is harsh and
unjustifiable and it should be repealed.[13]
Hon’ble
Mr. Justice Rajinder Sachar commented on the punishment for attempt to suicide
as “It is ironic that Section 309 Indian Penal Code still continues to be on
our Penal Code. The result is that a young boy driven to such frustration so as
to seek one's own life would have escaped human punishment if he had succeeded
but is to be bounded by the police, because attempt has failed. Strange paradox
that in the age of votaries of Euthanasia, suicide should be criminally
punishable. Instead of the society hanging its head in shame that there should
be such social strains that a young man (the hope of tomorrow, should be driven
to suicide compounds its inadequacy by treating the boy as a criminal. Instead
of sending the young boy to psychiatric clinic it gleefully sends him to mingle
with criminals, as if trying its best to see that in future he does fall foul
of the punitive sections of the Penal Code. The continuance of Section 309
Indian Penal Code is an anachronism unworthy of a humane society like ours.
Medical clinics for such social misfits certainly but police and prison never.
The very idea is revolting.”[14]
With
regards to the constitutional validity of section 309 of IPC the Bombay High
Court tested whether section 309 passed the test of Articles 14,19 and 21 of
constitution. With respect to Article 19 and 21 the Court held “The fundamental
rights enumerated in Art. 19 are only extensions of the right to life and have
no meaning without it. Essentially therefore we have to examine the precise
contents of Art. 21….There is nothing unnatural about the desire to die and
hence with the right to die. Whatever the circumstances which induce a person
to end or terminate his or her life, the act of termination of life is the act
of that individual. It is no less his than his act of living.”[15]
With respect to Article 14 the Court held “What may be considered suicide in
one community may not be considered so in another community and the different
acts, though suicidal, may be described differently in different circumstances
and at different times in the same community as we have seen earlier. While
some suicides are eulogised, others are condemned. That is why perhaps wisely
no attempts has been made by the legislature to define either. But the
difficulty in providing a plausible definition cannot certainly be pressed in
favour of the validity of the provision particularly when it is penal. The want
of plausible definition and even of guidelines to distinguish the felonious
from the non-felonious act itself therefore makes the provisions of S. 309 arbitrary
and violative of Art. 14. As is rightly said arbitrariness and equality are
enemies of each other.”[16]
The Bombay High Court in this case held Section 309 of IPC to be
unconstitutional.
In
the case of Chenna Jagadeeswar v. State of Andhra Pradesh (supra) the Andhra
High Court upheld the validity of Section 309 of IPC and observed that “From
these Articles, it is seen that the right to life is not specifically
mentioned. But, in a broader sense, unless a man is assured of physical
existence there can be no other fundamental right and since the State exists
for the common good of the citizens, no Constitution can ignore the right of
the citizens to life though it may not be explicitly explained. In these
circumstances, it is rather difficult to hold that the right to life impliedly
guaranteed by the Constitution includes the right to die.”[17]
The
Supreme Court tested the constitutional validity of section 309 in the case of P.Rathinam
vs. Union of India and held that “On the basis of what has been held and noted
above, we state that section 309 of the Penal Code deserves to be effaced from
the statute book to humanize our penal laws. It is a cruel and irrational
provision, and it may result in punishing a person again (doubly) who has
suffered agony and would be undergoing ignominy because of his failure to
commit suicide. Then an act of suicide cannot be said to be against religion,
26 morality or public policy and an act of attempted suicide has no baneful
effect on society. Further, suicide or attempt to commit it causes no harm to
others, because of which State’s interference with the personal liberty of the persons
concerned is not called for. We, therefore, hold that section 309 violates
Article 21, and so, it is void. May it be said that the view taken by us would
advance not only the cause of humanization, which is a need of the day, but of
globalization also, as by effacing section 309, we would be attuning this part
of criminal law to the global wavelength.”[18]
However,
the decision of the Supreme Court in P.Rathinam case was overruled by a larger
bench in the case of Smt. Gian Kaur v. State of Punjab where the Court held “To
give meaning and content to the word ‘life’ in Article 21, it has been
construed as life with human dignity. Any aspect of life which makes it
dignified may be read into it but not that which extinguishes it and is,
therefore, inconsistent with the continued existence of life resulting in
effacing the right itself. The ‘right to die’, if any, is inherently
inconsistent with the ‘right to life’ as is ‘death with life.”[19]
The Court upheld the constitutional validity of section 309 of IPC and observed
that right to life does not include right to die.
3.2 210th Report of Law
Commission of India:
210th
report of Law Commission of India is titled “Humanization and Decriminalization
of Attempt to Suicide”. The report studies the statistics relating to suicidal
deaths in India, the interpretation of section 306 and 309 of IPC as well as
the problems that are faced due to criminalization of attempt to suicide.
The
report highlights the following problems caused due to criminalization of
attempt to suicide:
“1. Emergency treatment for those who have attempted
suicide is not readily accessible as they are referred by local hospitals and doctors
to tertiary centres as it is termed as Medico Legal case. The time lost in the
golden hour will save many lives.
2. Those who attempt suicide are already distressed
and in psychological pain and for them to face the ignominy of police
interrogation causes increased distress, shame, guilt and further suicide
attempt.
3. At the time of family turmoil dealing with police
procedure adds to the woes of the family.
4. It also leads to a gross under-reporting of
attempted suicide and the magnitude of the problem is not unknown. Unless one
is aware of the nature of extent of the problem effective intervention is not
possible.
5. As many attempted suicides are categorized in the
guise of accidental poisoning etc. emotional and mental health support is not
available to those who have attempted as they are unable to access the services.”[20]
The
Law Commission report also mentioned that the President of the International
Association for Suicide Prevention, France, has, vide his letter of 9 October
2007 addressed to Hon’ble Minister of Law and Justice, Government of India,
strongly supported withdrawal of the status of attempted suicide as a
punishable offence. The report states, “He has stated that most countries in
the world who have had laws criminalizing attempted suicide have withdrawn
those laws in the second half of the twentieth century, justifying the
withdrawal by the belief that attempting suicide is not a crime that should be
punished but rather a desperate reaction to a difficult life situation by
people who usually suffer from a mental disorder. These changes have indicated
awareness that suicidal individuals need to be helped and imprisonment only
makes their problem worse. One of the fears expressed when all countries in
Europe and North America decriminalized attempted suicide was that suicide
rates may increase. There are no indications whatsoever that there was an
increase in suicides following decriminalization, and in many instances it is
thought that suicide decreased since more suicidal individuals received the
help they need… The International
Association for Suicide Prevention wishes India to join the countries of the
world, who have decriminalized attempted suicide in order to clearly communicate
to suicidal individuals that they should seek help, rather than avoid admitting
to their problems for fear of imprisonment”[21]
The
Commission recommended repeal of Section 309 of IPC as follows:
“5.3 Section 309 of the Indian Penal Code provides
double punishment for a person who has already got fed up with his own life and
desires to end it. Section 309 is also a stumbling block in prevention of
suicides and improving the access of medical care to those who have attempted
suicide. It is unreasonable to inflict punishment upon a person who on account
of family discord, destitution, loss of a dear relation or other cause of a
like nature overcomes the instinct of self-preservation and decides to take his
own life. In such a case, the
unfortunate person deserves sympathy, counselling and appropriate treatment,
and certainly not the prison.
5.4 Section 309 needs to be effaced from the statute
book because the provision is inhuman, irrespective of whether it is
constitutional or unconstitutional. The repeal of the anachronistic law
contained in section 309 of the Indian Penal Code would save many lives and
relieve the distressed of his suffering.
5.5 The Commission is of the view that while
assisting or encouraging another person to (attempt to) commit suicide must not
go unpunished, the offence of attempt to commit suicide under section 309 needs
to be omitted from the Indian Penal Code.”[22]
3.3 De-criminalization of attempt
to suicide:
On
the basis of the recommendation of Law Commission in its 210th
report, in December 2014 the Rajya Sabha after claiming support of 18 states
and 4 Union Territories decided to repeal Section 309 from the Indian Penal
Code.
While
attempt to commit suicide is decriminalized, abetment to commit suicide still
remains punishable under section 306 of IPC.
3.4 Law relating to mental illness:
Mental
Healthcare Act 2017 was enacted to provide for mental healthcare and services
for persons with mental illness and to protect, promote and fulfil the rights
of such persons during delivery of mental healthcare and services and for
matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. The Act defines mental
illness. The Act provides that a patient of mental illness may nominate a
representative of his choice who shall consider the current and past wishes,
the life history, values, cultural background and the best interests of the
person with mental illness; provide support to the person with mental illness
in making treatment decisions; be involved in discharge planning and perform
such other duties as are specified under the Act.[23]
The
Act also provides various rights of persons with mental illness such as:
(1) Right to access mental healthcare[24]
(2) Right to community living[25]
(3) Right to protection from cruel, inhuman and
degrading treatment[26]
(4) Right to equality and non- discrimination[27]
(5) Right to information[28]
(6) Right to confidentiality[29]
(7) Restriction on release of information in respect
of mental illness[30]
(8) Right to access medical records[31]
(9) Right to personal contacts and communication[32]
(10) Right to legal aid[33]
(11) Right to make complaints about deficiencies in
provision of services[34]
The
Act also casts a duty upon the Government to plan, design and implement
programmes for the promotion of mental health and prevention of mental illness
in the country and, in particular, plan, design and implement public health
programmes to reduce suicides and attempted suicides in the country.[35]
The Act also imposes a duty on the Government to create awareness about mental
health and illness and reduce stigma associated with mental illness.[36]
The
Act also provides for the establishment of an authority to deal with
applications and complaints by persons with mental illness.
3.5 Presumption in case of attempt
to commit suicide:
Section
115 of the Act provides a presumption in case of attempt to commit suicide as
follows:
“(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in section
309 of the Indian Penal Code any person who attempts to commit suicide shall be
presumed, unless proved otherwise, to have severe stress and shall not be tried
and punished under the said Code.
(2) The appropriate Government shall have a duty to
provide care, treatment and rehabilitation to a person, having severe stress
and who attempted to commit suicide, to reduce the risk of recurrence of
attempt to commit suicide.”[37]
It
is the duty of the Government to provide adequate facilities and treatment to
the person who attempts to commit suicide in order to rehabilitate him.
IV. CONCLUSION
The
attempt to commit suicide is no longer an offence but a provision is made in
the Mental Healthcare Act to presume that the person attempting suicide is
under severe stress and casts a duty upon the Government to provide care,
treatment and rehabilitation to a person, having severe stress and who
attempted to commit suicide, to reduce the risk of recurrence of attempt to
commit suicide. The abetment to commit suicide continues to remain an offence
under IPC.
With
the increasing problems of mental health in the youth these days, it is
essential that mental health education should also be made a part of the
academic curriculum in schools and colleges and there should also be counsels
appointed so that the students can talk and proper advice can be given to them.
There should also be meetings of people suffering from mental illness such as
depression so that they can talk out their feelings and when they listen to the
problems or feelings of other patients they may get a sense of hope and might
be cured.
There
are also various helplines setup by NGOs and Government so that the people who
have suicidal thoughts may call on those helplines and seek mental and
emotional help rather than succumbing to their suicidal urge.
Mental
illness and suicide go hand in hand and with the increase in suicidal deaths
and mental illness patients it is essential that steps must be taken so as to
prevent the people from falling prey to such evils.
REFERENCES:
[1] University of Manchester Centre
for Mental Health and Risk, "The National Confidential Inquiry into
Suicide and Homicide by People with Mental Illness", July 2012
[2] Kutcher S, Chehil S (2012), Suicide
Risk Management A Manual for Health Professionals (2nd ed.), pp. 30–33, ISBN 978-1-119-95311-1
[3]What is depression? Physician
Review by Dr. Ranna Parekh, January 2017
https://www.psychiatry.org/patients-families/depression/what-is-depression
[4] Section 2(s) of Mental
Healthcare Act 2017
[5] "Suicide Fact sheet N°398”,
WHO, April 2016
URL: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide
[6] Stedman's Medical Dictionary
(28th ed.) 2006, ISBN 978-0-7817-3390-8
[7] Hawton K, van Heeringen K (April
2009), “Suicide", Lancet. 373 (9672): 1372–81
URL: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(09)60372-X/fulltext
[8] Ibid.
[9] Fazel S, Runeson B,
"Suicide", New England Journal of Medicine, January 2020, 382 (3):
266–74
[10] Chenna Jagadeeswar And Anr. vs
State Of Andhra Pradesh, (1983) Crl. Law Journal 549
[11] Benoy vs. Aleyamma Kuriakose, 11th
August 2010, Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
[12] Berin P.Varghese vs State Of
Kerala, [1971] 27 S.T.C. 459
[13] Humanization and
Decriminalization of Attempt to Suicide; Law Commission of India; Report No.
210; October 2008
URL: http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/reports/report210.pdf
[14] State
vs Sanjay Kumar Bhatia, 1986 (10) DRJ 31
[15] Maruti
Shripati Dubal vs State Of Maharashtra, (1986) 88 BOMLR 589
[16]
Supra
[17]
Supra
[18] P.Rathinam
vs Union Of India, 1994 SCC (3) 394
[19] Smt.
Gian Kaur vs The State Of Punjab, 1996 SCC (2) 648
[20] Humanization
and Decriminalization of Attempt to Suicide; Law Commission of India; Report
No. 210; October 2008
URL: http://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/reports/report210.pdf
[21]
Supra
[22]
Supra
[23]
Section 17 of Mental Healthcare Act 2017.
[24]
Section 18 of Mental Healthcare Act 2017
[25]
Section 19 of Mental Healthcare Act 2017
[26]
Section 20 of Mental Healthcare Act 2017
[27]
Section 21 of Mental Healthcare Act 2017
[28]
Section 22 of Mental Healthcare Act 2017
[29]
Section 23 of Mental Healthcare Act 2017
[30]
Section 24 of Mental Healthcare Act 2017
[31]
Section 25 of Mental Healthcare Act 2017
[32]
Section 26 of Mental Healthcare Act 2017
[33]
Section 27 of Mental Healthcare Act 2017
[34]
Section 28 of Mental Healthcare Act 2017
[35]
Section 29 of Mental Healthcare Act 2017
[36]
Section 30 of Mental Healthcare Act 2017
[37]
Section 115 of Mental Healthcare Act 2017
0 comments:
Post a Comment